|
Home ׀ Contact Us ׀ Anchorlift ׀ Hardware ►Jefa◄ BlakesLavacTaylors ׀ Lopolight ׀ Trident ׀ Resellers ׀ Sitemap |
|
Historically stainless steel 316 has been the preferred rudder
shaft material. This material was chosen as it was non corrosive and strong and
widely available. At the end of last century aluminium and aluminium alloys
became widely available. Driven by the aircraft and space industry, new high
quality aluminium alloys were developed. Some of these alloys turned out to be
perfectly suitable for rudder shafts and other parts of sailing yachts.
Gradually all big boat yards making GRP yachts converted to aluminium rudder
shafts. But still some people, especially some designers, doubt about the use of
aluminium as rudder stock material. Hull material:The choice of hull material could fix the choice of the rudder stock material. On steel hulls one should use a stainless steel rudder shaft. On aluminium hulls one should choose an aluminium rudder shaft. More in depth info about this choice is explained on our electrolysis page. On GRP or composite hulls one has the choice between aluminium, stainless steel, and carbon. As Jefa Marine's primary production is targeted on metal rudder stocks we will go in depth in comparing aluminium and stainless steel. Important mechanical properties:To be able to evaluate the mechanical properties of metals one should first know that four of many mechanical properties of a metal are important for rudder stocks:
Characteristics of aluminium:The mechanical and anti-corrosion characteristics of aluminium depend on the alloy elements. Pure aluminium is not usable for a high strength purpose like a rudder shaft. The most popular aluminium alloy for rudder shafts is AlMgSi1 (EN 6082). The addition of the alloy element manganese extremely increases the mechanical properties proof stress and tensile strength. The addition of the alloy element silicon extremely increases the corrosion resistance of the aluminium. A hard and strong layer of silicon oxide SiO2 protects the aluminium even against the most hostile seawater. We use the following types of aluminium:
Characteristics of stainless steel:The mechanical and anti-corrosion characteristics of steel depend on the alloy elements and the heat treatment. By adding carbon, chrome and nickel to iron and heat tread it correctly, one achieves the alloy stainless steel. The protection against corrosion is not achieved by an oxide layer like aluminium, but the added chrome and nickel make sure the metal itself will not oxidise. We use the following types of stainless steel:
Comparing aluminium and stainless steel:Another important comparing factor, besides the mechanical properties, is the price of a rudder stock. In order to make a complete comparison between the four types of materials we will take an example of a complete rudder stock. A typical rudder stock has it's maximum diameter at the bottom bearing area, is tapered down to about 50% and up to about 60% of the maximum diameter, has a keyway, 3 or 4 spokes, and an emergency tiller connection.
When comparing the two most used materials, Al. 6082 and
stainless 316, the first thing that catches one's eye is the low proof stress of stainless
316. The proof stress is the most important strength figure for a material used
for rudder stocks. As soon as the stresses in the material rise above this
limit, the rudder shaft will be bend permanently. If self-aligning bearings are
used, there is a chance the rudder will still rotate. If non self-aligning
bearings are used, the rudder will be stuck in it's last position. Stainless 316
combines this low proof stress with a high tensile strength. Often people think
this is a big advantage over aluminium (61% higher), but actually this is a big
disadvantage. I think we all can agree that a bend rudder stock is useless, so
the real important figure is the proof stress, but what is the influence of the
tensile strength on the rudder shaft behaviour? Our opinion is that a high
tensile strength is undesirable: as soon as the rudder stock will start bending
permanently, a high loading will work on the bottom bearing. The rudder shaft
will try to bend the bearing out of the hull. The aluminium rudder shaft will
snap off at a loading 18% above the proof stress loading, the stainless 316
shaft will continue deforming up until the loading is 300% higher than the proof
stress. The bottom bearing will torque out of the hull creating an enormous hole
in the hull, mostly underneath the waterline with all unwanted consequences. One could wonder why so many boat builders choose aluminium as
preferred rudder shaft material: Aluminium 6082 combines a high proof stress
with a relatively light weight and a low price. On top of that it is fully
seawater resistant. In fact, the only downside of aluminium is the lower
E-module. The E-module is three times smaller than the E-module of stainless. In
practice this means that an aluminium rudder shaft with the same physical
dimensions as a stainless rudder shaft will bend three times further under a
certain loading. This is absolutely not a problem (take an aluminium aircraft
wing for example, it's also extremely strong, but could bend heavily under
loading) but one should consider using self-aligning bearings to guarantee a
smooth rotation under these high loads. On high performance racing yachts with very thin shaped rudder blades one could use the high strength aluminium 7075. The use of this material will give the opportunity to minimise the shaft diameter and thereby minimise the maximum rudder blade thickness. As this material is not seawater resistant, the complete rudder shaft will be anodised after production, making it completely electrically neutral, but a full proof guarantee on corrosion can not be given as any damage on the shaft will lead to corrosion. As these rudder shafts will bend under loading, it is vital to use self-aligning bearings. Conclusions:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||